Implementing Agency:
Department For International Development (DFIDSA)
Managing Institute:
Farm Africa
Contractor:
Farm Africa
Project Code: 059-508-006
059-599-005 |
Start Date: 01-May-93 |
End Date: 31/10/1996 |
Commitment: £287,500 |
Status: Completed |
Type of Funding: Multi-Funded |
Project Background:
The Institute for Social Development (ISD) is part of the University of the Western Cape
(UWC). In early 1991 a broad proposal for a project to support the disadvantaged
smallholder farmers of the Western Cape Region A (which stretches from the Namibian
border southeast to George and Knysna in the South Cape) and community vegetable growers
in the rural reserves and black townships of the Cape Town Metropolitan area, was drawn up
by Dr David Catling following discussions with the ISD and FARM-Africa.
The University of the Western Cape was set up in 1959 for those classified as "coloured" (of
mixed race). The University now has some 13,000 students, with an increasing proportion of
Africans, some Indians and a few whites.
The Western Cape is characterised by great physical diversity and extreme conditions. It
stretches from the temperate south coast to the sub-tropical climate of the northern Cape.
Arable farming is mainly restricted to South West Cape, the southern coastal plain, and in the
vicinity of boreholes and dams. The dry interior supports large flocks of sheep and goats,
with communal grazing. Some game farming is practised. Overgrazing is an historical
problem in Namaqualand; between 1974 and 1984 the carrying capacity of the land was
halved.
Farms are small, poorly provided with implements, far from significant markets, and lack
storage facilities. The ploughed area on the CRs is less than 1%; yields are always less than 1
tonne/ha. Only 8% of families have an income from arable farming.
Project Objectives:
The objective of the project is to improve the economic wellbeing of disadvantaged black
rural communities. The project will contribute to the formation of agriculture, research,
training and extension services.
Intended Outputs:
LDU staffed and functioning.
Surveys of existing farming practices and tests of new or adapted practices.
Socio-economic and agro-ecological databases.
Trained staff and farmers.
Modified small farm machinery.
Woodlots and fruit and shade trees.
Policy in the interest of an improved service to small scale farmers and growers is tabled at
appropriate points for discussion.
X people receive agricultural development education and training opportunities.
More practitioners reached and trained in appropriate approaches and methods.
Appropriate reports and factsheets for decision makers, practitioners, researchers and farmers
published.
Sufficient agricultural specialists knowledge, service and contracts available to supplement
LDU expertise.
X small scale farmers are introduced in a participatory proposal to Y appropriate options.
A network of appropriate non-agricultural resource people available to grass roots projects.
LDU is sustainable.
Confident and skilled small scale farmers and growers. Institutional support and
management abilities strengthen their farming.